Dirección Anual 2025

4 de agosto de 2025

Queridos amigos:

If you type “PFS” and “extremely rare” into your Google Search box, you will immediately find an article by the Wimpole hair-transplant clinic of London titled Post-Finasteride Syndrome: Should You Be Worried?

If you click on this article, which is characteristic of umpteen others popping up in such searches, you will soon find the following passage:

While there are plenty of anecdotal reports of persistent finasteride symptoms, there’s currently limited research into the causes and even the existence of post-finasteride syndrome. It’s also extremely rare—one study suggests approximately 1,000 men worldwide have PFS symptoms.

If you scroll down to the Sources section of this article and click the link to said study, you will find that, ah, there is no study.

What there is is commentary by Ralph Trüeb, MD, a professor of dermatology at the University of Zurich, published seven years ago in the International Journal of Tricology. The reason we know it’s commentary, rather than original research, is that it’s titled, ah, A Comment on the Post-Finasteride Syndrome.

And if you click on this commentary and read four paragraphs in, you will find the following sentence:

While the incidence of persistent sexual, mental, and physical side effects which continue despite quitting finasteride is unknown, it is likely that over 1,000 men worldwide are experiencing the effects.

So while Dr. Trüeb characterizes the global incidence of PFS as being, quote, “over” 1,000 men, the Wimpole Clinic, in an article medically reviewed by chief surgeon Michael May—and updated just four months ago—characterizes it as, misquote, “approximately” 1,000 men.

The distinction is important because approximately 1,000 means at least 950, but at most 1,050, right? Over 1,000, however, could mean any number in excess of 1,000, be it 1,001, 10,001, 100,001, or more, right?

Our point is, for a decade now we’ve watched the cosmetic-dermatology industry play fast and loose, often with data that are dubious from the get-go, in an effort to promote the idea that PFS may be rooted in some degree of physical pathology, but there’s little reason to worry because the chances of you developing the condition are minuscule. Not unlike the chances of, say, dying in a plane crash.

Not, ah, exactly.

We base that ineloquent statement on an upcoming milestone involving our website data.

Launched Aug. 28, 2012, pfsfoundation.org has racked up 988,914 unique visitors as of July 31, 2025, with average monthly traffic of 11,792 visitors year to date. At that rate, all-time historical traffic is projected to hit one million visitors by the end of this month.

As a representative sample of sorts, let’s look at a breakdown by inquiry type of the 3,700 people who’ve contacted us since we embarked upon our mission 13 years ago:

• Researchers soliciting funds for proposed PFS studies: 3 (0.8%)

• Vendors of supplements purported to be effective PFS therapies: 4 (0.1%)

• Attorneys inquiring about suing Merck and/or Organon on behalf of clients suffering from PFS: 11 (0.3%)

• Female PFS patients: 15 (0.4%)

• Men who never used, but were considering using, finasteride, inquiring about PFS: 22 (0.6%)

• Family members of PFS patients who committed suicide, asking why/how finasteride is still on the market: 26 (0.7%)

• Health providers inquiring about PFS on behalf of PFS patients: 67 (1.8%)

• Journalists seeking input for their PFS reports: 114 (3%)

• Family members of PFS patients, inquiring about the condition: 172 (4.6%)

• Male PFS patients: 3,266 (88.2%)

If we put aside the 143 inquiries that don’t necessarily correlate to discrete PFS cases (researchers, vendors, men who never used finasteride, and journalists), we’re left with 3,557 reported PFS cases, totaling 96% of our sample.

Now, if we apply that same proportion to our one million website visitors, we get 960,000 reported cases of PFS worldwide.

Even if our extrapolation is off by 50%, that’s still 480,000 cases—which is 47,900% more than the Wimpole Clinic, and many finasteride-prescribing enterprises like it, would have us believe exist in 2025.

Oh, and, ah, one more thing.

At press time, the Propecia label that Wimpole links to from its How to Get Finasteride page is dated 2010. That’s a dozen years prior to the latest label revision, dated 2022.

The 2010 iteration now infamously states that “certain sexual side effects,” which in the original clinical trials “occurred in less than 2% of men,” “went away in men who stopped taking Propecia.”

It also makes no mention of “suicidal ideation and behavior” as a reported adverse reaction, which was finally added in 2022.

Worse still, Wimpole’s finasteride page, medically reviewed by staff surgeon Mir Malkani—who, according to his profile, is the expert witness in UK hair-transplant medical malpractice cases—was updated just five months ago.

On that note, let’s get to the highlights of our regulatory, research, and awareness efforts from the past 12 months.

REGULATORY ACTIVITY

If you’re a manufacturer, prescriber, or dispenser of finasteride, the past 10 months have probably been a thorn in your side the size of the Eiffel Tower. Because for the first time ever, an entire continent was directed to hand over any/all evidence of the drug’s causal relationship to a set of adverse reactions that few, if any, patients would knowingly risk. And who’s to say this pharmacovigilance exercise won’t soon play out on other continents, what with AI now able to swiftly analyze decades of historical ADR data while tracking new ADRs in real time?

Old World audit

On October 4, 2024, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) launched an investigation into reported links between finasteride therapy and suicidality. The five-month procedure was directed by the EMA’s Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee, assessing all available data on this growing public-health concern, while weighing its impact on the benefit-risk balance of both finasteride and fellow 5-alpha reductase inhibitor (5-ARI) dutasteride.

A total of 30 nations—27 EU member states, along with Iceland, Lichtenstein and Norway—are overseen by the EMA, while 200 pharmaceutical companies are authorized to market finasteride and dutasteride in those nations. Each company, aka marketing authorization holder, was required to respond to a series of questions digging into the suicide trend from an epidemiological and economic point of view.

On May 8, the EMA released the results of its probe, concluding that finasteride “can cause depressed mood, depression or suicidal thoughts. In some patients taking 1 mg finasteride tablets, problems with sexual function…may contribute to mood changes, including suicidal thoughts.” In all, the investigation turned up 313 cases of suicidal ideation probably or possibly stemming from finasteride use, and 13 probably or possibly from dutasteride use. The majority of those cases involved patients taking finasteride 1 mg for hair loss.

The EMA nonetheless opted not to suspend or remove 5-ARIs from the market, concluding that “the benefits of finasteride and dutasteride medicines continue to outweigh their risks for all approved uses,” and adding “A warning about mood changes, including depression, depressed mood and suicidal ideation, is already included in the product information for finasteride medicines.”

End of story? Much to the chagrin of finasteride purveyors from Iceland to Italy, nope.

Just four days later, Belgium’s Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products issued a statement that read, in part:

The [EMA] concluded that a causal relationship between oral finasteride 1 mg and suicidal thoughts has been confirmed and that a positive benefit-risk ratio in the indication androgenic alopecia remains positive when appropriate risk mitigation measures are implemented. However, analysis of the data clearly revealed new aspects of the risks associated with psychiatric disorders and sexual dysfunction. These risks significantly alter the safety profile of oral finasteride 1 mg for the approved indication for androgenic alopecia… Consequently, Belgium considers that the benefit-risk ratio of finasteride 1 mg in androgenic alopecia is negative.

Eleven days after that, French drug-regulatory authority ANSM issued its position on the EMA’s recommendations, which read, in part:

The measures proposed…to reduce the risk of suicidal ideation with finasteride 1 mg (update of product information, introduction of a patient-alert card, and dissemination of a letter to healthcare professionals) appear to be insufficient. This situation is all the more alarming because, despite our implementation over the years of multiple risk-reduction measures …serious cases of psychiatric disorders and sexual dysfunction continue to be reported… In this context, ANSM considers that no action proposed by the [EMA] can satisfactorily reduce these risks.

New World warning

Shortly ahead of the EMA releasing the results of its finasteride investigation, the world’s most influential drug-regulatory agency issued its own finasteride warning vis-à-vis an increasingly popular formulation of the drug.

On April 22, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) alerted consumers, health care providers and compounders that “There are potential serious risks associated with the use of compounded topical finasteride products.” That, based on 32 cases involving symptoms common to PFS reported to the agency’s Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) between 2019 and 2024. Among those adverse reactions are: erectile dysfunction, anxiety, suicidal ideation, brain fog, depression, fatigue, insomnia, decreased libido, and testicular pain.

Most of those 32 cases, the agency noted, involve side effects that “continued to persist after product discontinuation.” Notably, some of the affected topical-finasteride patients complained they had no idea the product could lead to adverse reactions, having been told by prescribers that there was no risk of such, due to the fact that it’s applied to the skin rather than taken orally.

EPIDEMIOLOGY

AI or no AI, the World Health Organization (WHO) is doing a bang-up job of painting an increasingly accurate picture of finasteride’s negative impact on human health.

Five-figure spike

For the first 17 weeks of 2025, the average rise in new finasteride ADRs reported to the agency’s VigiBase database was 29.5, ranging from a low of five per week to a high of 42. But for the week ending May 11, the number of new ADRs—much like a reverse stock-market correction—clocked in at 3,032.

That’s a 10,178% increase over the weekly average, and a 13% increase in total historical ADRs. While the WHO declined to offer any interpretation of this unprecedented surge, it seems reasonable to believe it was related to recent actions by the EMA and FDA, along with resultant media coverage.

Since May, finasteride ADRs have continued to rise, albeit at pre-spike levels. On Jan. 1, they stood at 21,794. By July 31, they’d grown to 25,513, which means a year-to-date total of 3,719 new ADRs. Divide that by the 212 days that have passed between Jan. 1 and July 31, and we get an average of more than 17 ADRs per day.

The WHO has been aggregating finasteride ADRs from its 194 member states since 1993, when the drug was granted market authorization by the FDA. In 2024, they shot to a record 2,127, representing a 181% rise over 2023. If we run the same calculation for 2025, we get a 75% rise over last year’s record, yet with 22 weeks still left in the year.

Over the past decade, total finasteride ADRs have ballooned 102%, from 12,586 to 25,513, while suicidal ideation has surged 317%, from 171 to 713. For the same period, suicide attempt has climbed 100%, from 27 to 54, and completed suicide has escalated 187%, from 40 to 115.

(For additional epidemiological data, see our PFS by the Numbers page.)

RESEARCH

Speaking of epidemiology—and research—this year’s PFS Data-Mining Award goes to a nation not sitting on either side of the pond, nor known for elucidating critical aspects of emerging epidemics.

That would be China.

Say what?

In June, researchers at the Chengdu Seventh People’s Hospital published a paper that stopped thisshort of proving finasteride causes brain fog. Titled Association between finasteride with subjective memory deficits: a study from the NHANES and FAERS databases, the Frontiers in Neurology investigation was designed “to establish an evidence-based framework for clinical safety evaluation and therapeutic risk-benefit analysis.”

Hua Huang led a team of five fellow PhDs who dove deep into two sources: FAERS, the FDA’s public database ADRs, and NHANES, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, conducted annually by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to measure Americans’ health through physical exams, lab tests, and interviews that include questions about prescription drugs, dietary supplements, dietary intake, and socioeconomic traits.

“Convergent evidence from both epidemiological studies and pharmacovigilance surveillance suggests a potential association between finasteride administration and cognitive dysfunction,” wrote Prof. Huang.

In all, the team found 640 cases of cognitive dysfunction associated with finasteride use, 114 from NHANES, reported between 2001 and 2018; and 526 from FAERS, reported between 2004 and 2018. Within the FAERS population, the reporting odds ratio (ROR) scores, which measured the potential links between finasteride and ADRs, were most intense for:

  1. Learning disorders (48.83)
  2. Cognitive disorders (30.85)
  3. Thought blocking (28.86)
  4. Illusion (18.51)
  5. Reading disorder (13.52)
  6. Disturbance in attention (11.88)
  7. Sensory loss (10.45)
  8. Dysphemia, aka stuttering (10.28)

An ROR value of 10 or higher typically indicates a signal that calls for further investigation to confirm the link, and to assess causality. Signals, in turn, are detectable changes in pathology patterns that can indicate an epidemic.

Giving inflammation the boot

If you’re a former finasteride user plagued by persistent side effects like gastrointestinal distress, muscle weakness, rapid weight gain, or poor bone health, relief could one day come in the form of allopregnanolone (ALLO).

So demonstrated Roberto Cosimo Melcangi, PhD, Head of the Neuroendocrinology Unit in the Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences at the University of Milano (UniMi) in the first of his Milano Project studies, published last month in Biomolecules.

Titled Exploration of the Possible Relationships Between Gut and Hypothalamic Inflammation and Allopregnanolone: Preclinical Findings in a Post-Finasteride Rat Model, the research, led by Team Melcangi’s Silvia Diviccaro, PhD, “aimed to investigate the effects of finasteride withdrawal (FW) in a rat model and evaluate the potential protective effects of ALLO on gut and hypothalamic inflammation.”

“This preclinical study shows that FW causes inflammation in both the gut and hypothalamus in rats,” Diviccaro concluded. “ALLO treatment helped reduce several of these effects. These results suggest ALLO could have a protective role and have potential as a treatment for PFS patients.”

Symptoms of gut inflammation, which can occur anywhere in the gastrointestinal system, often include abdominal pain, diarrhea, bloody stool, and chronic fatigue. Inflammation in the hypothalamus can manifest itself in an even greater number of symptoms, including: out-of-control appetite and thirst, rapid weight gain or weight loss, frequent urination, low body temperature, heart-rate irregularities, insomnia, muscle weakness, poor bone health, reduced vision, headaches, insomnia, and infertility.

Launched April 2024 in partnership with the PFS Foundation, the Milano Project is a three-year effort comprising seven preclinical studies designed to map the basic science of PFS and, in turn, identify potential therapies for this emerging epidemic. Next up:

Investigation 2: Does loss of libido originate in the brain? Many behavioral parameters have been analyzed in a PFS animal model, confirming alterations in motivational behavior and anxiety-like behaviors. The resultant data helped identify areas of the brain involved in various PFS symptoms, thus providing a roadmap of which tissues to focus on in subsequent analyses. STATUS: This paper will soon be submitted for publication.

Investigation 3: How don’t you feel? Possible mechanisms involved in genital numbness and paresthesia, symptoms common among PFS patients, have been identified in an animal model. Among them is the expression of PIEZO 2, which can play a role in sexual dysfunction and genital insensitivity. These observations, representing the first-ever explanation of the latter PFS symptom at the genetic level, represent a possible target for future therapeutic strategies. STATUS: Results obtained thus far by Team Melcangi’s Prof. Silvia Giatti, PhD, on PIEZO 2 in the PFS experimental model will be submitted for publication by year end.

UniMiTube

If such brief, periodic glimpses into the work of Team Melcangi sometimes leave you with more unanswered than answered questions, you’ll likely be thrilled to learn what Robb Dixon did last month.

The Communications Director for SIDEfxHUB—our fundraising partner in Europe—flew from his home in Lisbon to Melcangi’s lab in Milano. There, he spent hours with the team, invterviewing key players from whom we’ve not previously heard, including Silvia Giatti, PhD, Lucia Cioffi, PhD(c), and Gabriela Chrostek, PhD(c). Among the fine points they discussed were finasteride’s impact on the brain synapses of male rats, the role of PIEZO 2 as it decreases during withdrawal of the drug, and genetic differences between PFS and post-SSRI sexual dysfunction (PSSD) vis-à-vis therapeutic targets.

But the lion’s share of the resultant 90-minute documentary, titled Inside the Milano Project (YouTube, August 2), is devoted to a one-on-one interview with Melcangi.

In addition to explaining how he became the world’s foremost PFS investigator (“I actually wrote my graduate thesis on 5-alpha reductase”), Melcangi delves not only into the scientific aspects of his mission to identify effective therapies, but the politics of doing so.

“From the community’s point of view, there are all these rumors about what you do, what you don’t do. And people think you have a very narrow view of what PFS is,” says Robb. “Another misconception is that they’ll be able to find a researcher who’s really interested in PFS, first of all, and who has a lab that can be used for free. But these things don’t exist.”

“I know, and I agree. A lot of patients write me and tell me, You don’t do this line of research, you don’t cover that aspect,” says Melcangi. “But they have no idea how time-consuming this research is, and the money it costs. When we perform these experiments in an animal model with all the necessary molecular biologists—who are often at other research facilities—we wind up having to have 10 of them working simultaneously.”

Favorable odds

Hard as it is to believe that there could be an effective oral therapy for genital numbness in the not-too-distant future, it’s even harder to believe that relief for the same persistent side effect could come even sooner from a wholly different drug applied topically. But thanks to Stanley Kim, that’s exactly what we’re telling you.

As CEO of WinSanTor, a San Diego-based biotech firm focuses solely on developing treatments for what’s medically known as peripheral neuropathy (PN), Stan is on a mission to get his sole product, topical pirenzepine 4% (WST-057), into the hands of PFS and PSSD sufferers ahead of its FDA approval.

So in September, he launched a survey seeking to gauge the size of, and severity among, those two patient populations. Four months later, having amassed some 10,000 subscribers, he created an Expanded Access Program (commonly known as compassionate use) for WST–057, meaning patients in the US who suffer from the condition can ask their doctors to file an FDA application requesting a prescription. If approved, the Rx is forwarded to WinSanTor for filling.

Stan also launched a GoFundMe campaign with a target goal of $200,000, to help subsidise the cost of WST-057 therapy, which runs about $1,800 per patient over a six-month period. To date, he has raised more than $45,000.

The cat herder cometh

After years of various parties kicking around the idea of gathering the world’s leading PFS researchers in one room to brainstorm the most promising strategies for developing PFS therapies, one man is finally doing it.

In May, Kenneth M. Peters, MD, Chair of Urology at Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, launched Phase I of his mission to resolve the devastating impact of not only finasteride, but other popular drugs known to cause persistent side effects. That, via a study titled Interconnected Post-Drug Syndromes: Investigating the Impact of Retinoids, SSRIs, and Finasteride on Health and Well-being, whose findings he will seek to publish in a peer-reviewed journal.

The HIPAA-compliant research, designed to better gauge the severity of the most common post-drug syndromes, was open to anyone 18 years of age or older who took, then discontinued, finasteride, saw palmetto, retinoids, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), or tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs).

With Phase I of his project now closed, Dr. Peters is in the planning stage of Phase II, a symposium attended by the top scientific minds investigating each respective syndrome, along with efforts to identify funding sources for new research into those syndromes.

MEDIA AWARENESS

It began in October, when one of the world’s most influential newspapers called to bounce ideas off us for a report on largely warning-free access to finasteride via telehealth firms. And this intense media interest in PFS didn’t subside until April, after an overseas magazine emailed us in broken English to ask if we knew any local men who suffer from PFS.

Looking back now, we can only recall those seven months as a dizzying array of Zoom meetings with reporters and producers; exhaustive conversations with patients in our database, asking if they’d be willing to go public with their condition; more hours than we’d like to admit subtitling 18 minutes of Spanish TV-news segments; and incessantly chugging black ice tea while churning out all our coverage of the media coverage playing out across the Northern Hemisphere.

The good news is, thanks to much impactful media attention, 2025 will go down as the year in which PFS went from little-recognized medical condition to mainstream topic of conversation.

Let’s take the best of it geo-chronologically.

Spain: February

On February 4, Carlos Sarasa González-Aller, a 46-year-old PFS patient, ascended to the roof of Paseo Castellana 163 in Madrid’s financial district, where he worked for cloud communications firm Sinch. About an hour later, despite desperate pleas from his colleague Nacho, he leapt 12 stories to an instant death. But before doing so, Carlos texted Nacho a note that read:

I can’t get out of this dark hole I’ve fallen into. I can’t sleep or focus on anything. My life is hell. I took a hair-loss medication that caused my depression. I’ve tried everything to heal myself, but nothing works. It’s called post-finasteride syndrome. Never take it.

Alfredo Pascual, a reporter with El Confidencial, Spain’s largest online newspaper, quickly got wind of the dramatic suicide, but it took him more than two weeks to nail the story down. Finally, on February 28, he published a scoop headlined A Few Days Ago, Carlos Threw Himself from a Roof in Castellana: He Blamed a Hair-loss Drug (English here).

The next day, a media firestorm erupted, sending shockwaves throughout the nation. “Could a hair-loss pill, one that’s sold on some websites without a prescription”—untold citizens asked—“really cause a man to kill himself?”

On Antena 3, Spain’s most watched channel, Espejo Público (English) host Susanna Griso fanned out eight pages of side effects reportedly caused by finasteride. Eighty-two in all, they ran the gamut from “abnormally slow heartbeat” to “burning anal pain” to “sensation of pressure in the head” to “vision problems.” And, yes, “suicidal ideation.” Co-host Miquel Valls, meanwhile, admitted “I took this medication for months… I eventually stopped on my doctor’s advice, because it had several side effects that were affecting my personal life.”

Over on competing network 5 Telecino, the mood was equally intense, with El Programa de Ana Rosa (English) bannered “MAN JUMPS FROM BUILDING, BLAMING HAIR-LOSS MEDICATION.” “It is true that there exists a possible link between finasteride use and increased risk of suicidal ideation and depression,” Carmen Fernández-Antón, MD, told host Ana Rosa Quintana.

While flashing the question “HAIR-LOSS PILLS THAT ENCOURAGE SUICIDE?” another 5 Telecino program characterized finasteride as “A go-to treatment for many celebrities.” “John Travolta tried everything to avoid going bald—hair transplants, wigs—all without success. Elon Musk…also uses this drug. Donald Trump does anything to continue showing off his famous blonde hair,” Tarde (English) reported in its coverage of Carlos’s death.

Canada: March

On March 6, the Canadian Broadcasting Corp. (CBC) debuted an Enquête documentary titled Betting on Hair, Gambling on Health (English), which examined the myriad risks of finasteride use, along with allegations that the medication’s originator, Merck & Co., “knew of these risks but chose to downplay them in order to maximize profits.”

In all, lead reporter Brigitte Noël and director Judith Plamondon spent six months investigating incidence of PFS in Canada, speaking to 25 patients who suffer from the condition, three of whom appeared on camera. Wei Wong used topical finasteride, which is often touted as being safer than oral finasteride—despite scant scientific evidence to that effect—but discontinued the medication after just 10 days. “Immediately the next day… I was in pain. I could not think clearly. I did not have any motivation to do anything. I was in pure survival mode,” he said.

Enquête also spoke to Denise Turner, whose son Marc Turner took his own life three years ago, at age 36, after developing PFS. She recalled: “Before he died, he said, ‘I wish it was cancer.’ That’s a terrible thing to say, I told him. ‘But you don’t understand. There’s compassion for cancer patients.’ He said, ‘There’s no compassion for PFS patients.’”

Seeing as Enquête is French Canada’s highest-rated investigative newsmagazine series, we were pleased with the exposure, and never would have thought to press for more press. Thankfully, the CBC network bosses saw things differently, spreading the report across all its news platforms, both English- and French-language—TV, radio and print. That combined entity, known as CBC/Radio-Canada, reaches more than 20 million people per month.

USA: March

On March 13, after its six-month investigation, The Wall Street Journal published a report headlined They Wanted a Quick Fix for Hair Loss. Instead, These Young Men Got Sick, which examined the correlation between ever-easier access to finasteride from companies like Hims and Keeps, and an upswing in the number of finasteride patients reporting persistent adverse reactions to the drug.

Sawyer Hart was 27 and healthy when he got his finasteride prescription from Keeps in 2023. A week in, Hart experienced erectile dysfunction, so he stopped taking the drug. After that, unexplained panic attacks kept him home, and he was later hospitalized,” wrote Rolfe Winkler, who covers digital health exclusively for the business bible.

In addition to Sawyer, Rolfe spoke to 16 other PFS patients who were prescribed generic Propecia by telehealth companies. Most all complained that they weren’t aware the hair-loss medication carried any risks of serious side effects. Some said as well that what scant warnings they were given were inadequate.

“Finasteride…has been on the market for three decades with potential side effects including sexual dysfunction and depression. But a new generation of young men are discovering the medicine—and its potential risks,” Rolfe continued. “That is largely because they are peppered with ads on social media pitching hair-loss medications from telehealth companies, which unlike drugmakers aren’t required to disclose side effects and other risks in advertisements. It is a loophole telehealth companies have long exploited to sell medicines.”

UK: April

On April 18, the BBC debuted the product of, yes, its six-month investigation into PFS.

“Around 6.5 million men in the UK are currently affected by hair loss,” said Ashley John-Baptiste on the April 18 edition of Dr Xand’s Con or Cure. “But when a so-called cure brings about worse side effects than you could imagine, it doesn’t seem like such a cure after all.”

“In September of last year, a [freedom of information] request to the [UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency] revealed that 228 men got in touch with them about their adverse reactions to finasteride,” Ashley noted. “The MHRA say these numbers do not directly equate to the number of people who might actually suffer adverse reactions, just those who reported.”

So Con or Cure—whose mission is to “shine a light on medical malpractice and criminal behavior to help you take your health into your own hands”—tracked down and interviewed 10 of those men who did report, two of whom volunteered to share their stories on camera.

“After three weeks of taking finasteride, I started experiencing genital numbness, I suffered from a rash that didn’t disappear. I also suffered from stomach issues. So I stopped taking it after about four weeks,” said Shaun from London.

His worsening symptoms soon led him to the brink of self-destruction. “I experienced something called the crash. All my limbs felt weak. I couldn’t formulate a sentence. My speech was slurring. I had terrible chronic fatigue, panic attacks; crazy suicidal thoughts and depression.”

Russia: April

Nine days before the EMA released the results of its finasteride probe, Russia joined Britain, Canada, Spain, and the US in promoting PFS awareness. On April 29, the independent news portal Takie Dela published its nation’s first-ever investigation into the condition, headlined How Men Live up to Social Expectations (English). It began:

Russia is among the top 20 countries with the highest prevalence of male alopecia… According to media reports…more and more young people [here], including teenagers, are turning to doctors to treat their hair loss.

The 2,200-word report by Alexey Semenov, which referenced the FDA’s safety alert on compounded topical finasteride products, featured interviews with two Russian PFS patients, Vasily and Dmitry, who first contacted the PFS Foundation for help in 2017 and 2025, respectively.

Vasily was prescribed finasteride 15 years ago, at age 26, by a hair-transplant surgeon. Six months into treatment, he was beset by genital shrinkage and sexual dysfunction. “Instead of sperm, there was some kind of white foam, and my testicles appeared to be deflated,” he told Alexey. “It was the rudest of awakenings.”

Like countless PFS patients before him, Vasily consulted with numerous doctors, but they didn’t turn up any abnormalities. They simply advised him to wait six months. After doing so, however, he still didn’t recover. “Naturally, I haven’t had any romantic relationships during these past 15 years, let alone started a family,” he said. “My life is ruined.”

(For additional news coverage, see our PFS Media Awareness page.)

MEDICAL AWARENESS

Another milestone on the horizon

Clinicians, pharmacologists and researchers continue to voice their concerns about finasteride use, particularly in young men. Year over year, the number of such professionals aggregated on our Doctors & Researchers Speaking Out page rose from 158 to 190, which means by this time next year, we’ll no doubt be in 200+ territory.

Among the 32 new entrants is Georgios Tsampoukas, MD, a urologist at London’s Homerton University Hospital whose review article, Post-finasteride syndrome—a true clinical entity? was published in February in the International Journal of Impotence Research. “Future directions for PFS research should concentrate on elucidating specific causative factors, aiming to redefine PFS from a broadly symptomatic syndrome to a disease with a clear etiological basis, potentially leading to targeted treatment modalities,” he wrote. “This endeavor is not only scientifically crucial but also addresses significant bioethical concerns raised by the current syndrome-based diagnosis.”

Four months earlier, in the Journal of the Endocrine Society, Donal O’Shea, MD, of St. Vincent’s University Hospital in Dublin, presented a case study of one of his patients, 45, who developed PFS after taking oral finasteride for hair loss. “He first presented to endocrinology services having stopped finasteride after 20 years, reporting new onset reduced libido, penile shrinkage, fatigue, new food intolerances and agitated depression which was the predominant symptom in this case,” Dr. O’Shea wrote. “Neuropsychiatric symptoms are likely related to the presence of 5-alpha-reductase isoforms in the brain with resulting alterations in CSF and plasma neuroactive steroid levels and metabolites… Further studies in this regard, as well as an exploration of effective treatment options are required.”

POSTHUMOUS AWARENESS

Death of a Yale man

On December 16, Kelsey Libner took a cereal bowl from the kitchen of his Manhattan apartment, walked into his bedroom, and filled the bowl with three ingredients: water, sodium nitrate, and potassium nitrate. After drinking the solution, he lay on his bed as methemoglobinemia, a condition wherein blood is unable to transport oxygen to the body’s tissues, set in. Within an hour, he ceased to exist.

Of all the patient suicides we’ve endured over the years here at the PFS Foundation, Kelsey’s affected us most profoundly. Because not long after first emailing us for help on Christmas Eve of 2015, he became as much of a partner as a patient.

A week after that email—on New Year’s Eve—Kelsey telephoned us, eager to discuss his case in more detail, while intensely focused on the research we’d funded at Harvard Medical School, Baylor College of Medicine, and University of Milano.

Such discussions would become regular events over the next five years, with Kelsey showing an amazing capacity to locate, consume and analyze virtually every iota of finasteride info published anywhere. That, to the point where we eventually began learning things about the drug from him.

By late 2020, as his PFS symptoms failed to subside, Kelsey, who graduated from Yale University in 1994, resolved to act on two fronts.

Awareness-wise, he launched Finasteride Watch, which began as a bibliography of published studies and commentary encompassing all points of view vis-à-vis PFS. Within a year, however, he’d expanded the content to include categories ranging from Adverse event data to Weighing the risks.

Research-wise, he made an equally important contribution. When we told him that Melcangi had sent us the protocol for a study seeking to demonstrate that ALLO might be effective in counteracting finasteride-induced alterations in gut microbiota, he grew enthusiastic. After all, positive findings could spell the beginning of the end of his worst PFS symptoms.

Then came the tough part—telling Kelsey we didn’t have sufficient funds for the study. Instead of sulking, however, he immediately mailed us a check to cover its costs: $15,000. Eighteen months later, the research was published in Biomolecules, showing that ALLO can in fact fix finasteride-damaged gut microbiota (at least in rats), thus marking the first known proof of recovery from a PFS symptom.

As we set out on Year 14 of our mission, we ask everyone to honor Kelsey’s memory by giving generously so that we may continue this urgent work.

In the meantime, as directed on our Report Your Side Effects page, anyone living in the US who suffers from PFS should report his or her symptoms to the FDA. Anyone living outside the US who suffers from the condition should also report to the FDA, as well as to his or her local DRA.

Finally, if you or a loved one are suffering from PFS and feeling depressed or unstable, please don’t hesitate to contact us via our Patient Support hotline: social@pfsfoundation.org

Sincerely,

Philip Recchia
President

Related News

2024 PFS Foundation Annual Address

2023 PFS Foundation Annual Address

2022 PFS Foundation Annual Address

2021 PFS Foundation Annual Address

2020 PFS Foundation Annual Address

2019 PFS Foundation Annual Address

2018 PFS Foundation Annual Address

2017 PFS Foundation Annual Address

2016 PFS Foundation Annual Address

2015 PFS Foundation Annual Address

2014 PFS Foundation Annual Address

2013 PFS Foundation Annual Address